2.2  Matter to Energy Conversion.

In (2.6) above, if the applied temporal force is in the opposite temporal direction, i.e. if
F = 0 r - j Ft
(2.15)
so as to encourage temporal motion into the future, then via an identical analysis to that above, (2.14) becomes
m = m0 - Ft t

c
(2.16)
This result infers that energy is being extracted from the mass by the applied temporal force. Converting (2.16) to energy gives
E = m0 c2 - Ft tc
(2.17)
and the rate of extraction is then
P = dE

dt
= - Ft c
(2.18)

Consequently it would appear that the power available from such a conversion could, from the application of a very small force, be substantial. For instance, with Ft =1gm, in (2.18)

P = 300,000Kgm.m/sec = 2.94MW
(2.19)
Also in (2.17) when E = 0
t = m0 c

Ft
(2.20)
and therefore a 1gm.sec2/m mass of matter, subjected to the 1gm temporal force would last for
t = 9.51 years
(2.21)
delivering the above power. This is sufficient to provide all the power requirements of about 1,960 typically British homes for nearly 10 years, assuming losses are small by comparison. Such a source of power, if it could be harnessed, would be virtually limitless and extremely inexpensive. The main problem to be solved however, which is obviously a formidable one, is the development of a means of generating and applying a temporal force.

2.3  Spatial Travel at the Terminal Velocity of D0, ( ~ the Velocity of Light).

It is well known that Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity shows that it is not possible to accelerate a mass to the velocity of light. To do so would require an infinite amount of energy, and take an infinite amount of time. However, this result assumes that the applied force is all purely spatial. To investigate the effect of a combined spatial/temporal force, consider the time differential of (2.1), i.e.

F = dM

dt
= æ
è
m dv

dt
+ v dm

dt
ö
ø
r + j ì
÷
í
÷
î
c dm

dt
æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
-

vm

c æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
dv

dt
ü
÷
ý
÷
þ
(2.22)
where the subscript r has been dropped from the spatial velocity as no longer necessary. If the applied force is a spatial/temporal one such that
F = F0 æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
r - j F0 v

c
(2.23)
where F0 is a constant, then substitution of (2.23) into (2.22) gives Spatial
m dv

dt
+ v dm

dt
= F0 æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
(2.24)
Temporal
c dm

dt
æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
-

vm

c æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
dv

dt
= - F0 v

c
(2.25)
and as will be shown below, (2.24) and (2.25) represent the "zero mass rate" equations of motion of the mass m. In this case the spatial-temporal Force/Velocity diagram is as shown in Fig.2.2 below.

Picture 2

Fig. 2.2 - Zero Mass Rate Force/Velocity Diagram

and the force/reaction diagram as in Fig. 2.3 below

Picture 3

Fig. 2.3 - Zero Mass Rate Force/Reaction Diagram.

These diagrams can be compared with [1], Figs. 3.1 and 3.2 to show the difference to the application of a purely spatial force. It is clear from (2.23) that the spatial/temporal force vector F is applied precisely at right angles to the Existence Velocity vector and then continuously adjusted to remain so. It is this feature of the applied force vector that ensures that the mass rate remains non-existent. Hence the absence of the mass rate terms in the diagrams. The ensuing analysis will confirm this and derive the other characteristics of the motion. With F0 being constant, (2.25) can be integrated by inspection to give

mc æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
= - F0 r

c
+ k
(2.26)
where although this has been derived from a temporal equation, r is the spatial distance moved in the direction of travel. Invoking the initial conditions viz. v = 0, r = 0, and m = m0 when t = 0 gives
k = m0 c
(2.27)
and substitution of this into (2.26) then gives
m =

m0 c2 - F0 r

c2 æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
(2.28)
Clearly the application of the negative temporal component of the applied force is extracting energy from the mass. This energy could then be used to supply the spatial part of the impressed force. The mass is thereby acting as "matter fuel" to maintain its own drive. Also it would appear from (2.28) that m = 0 when
r = m0 c2

F0
(2.29)
and, it will shown later that this result still represents an anomaly, even though at this point v=c so that in fact (2.28) then becomes indeterminate,. Now differentiating (2.28) with respect to the time gives the time rate of change of mass thus
dm

dt
=
( m0 c2 - F0 r ) v

c2
dv

dt
- F0 v æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø

c2 æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø
3/2

 
(2.30)
Eqs (2.28) and (2.30) may now be substituted into (2.24) to give

m0 c - F0 r

c2 æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
dv

dt

+
( m0 c2 - F0 r ) v2

c2
dv

dt
- F0 v2 æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø

c2 æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø
3/2

 
= F0 æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
(2.31)
which reduces to

m0 c2 - F0 r

c2 æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
dv

dt
= F0 æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
(2.32)
and comparison of (2.32) with (2.24) and (2.28) clearly shows that
dm

dt
= 0
(2.33)
i.e. the mass rate is non-existent. The interpretation of this is that the relativistic increase in mass due to the application of the spatial part of the impressed force, is exactly offset by the reduction in mass due to the extraction of energy by the temporal part of the impressed force. Consequently not only are there no inertial effects, but effectively there is no increase in mass due to the storage of kinetic energy, i.e. energy mass is maintained at the level of rest mass during the whole period that the impressed force obeys (2.23). Accordingly (2.30) can be equated to zero to yield after minor reduction
dv

dt
= a0
1 - v2

c2

1 - a0 r

c2
(2.34)
where
a0 = F0

m0
(2.35)
and is the spatial acceleration at t = 0.

Also, in (2.28) this means that the mass m must be constant at the value of rest mass , thus
m0 =
m0 c2 - F0 r

c2 æ
è
1 - v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
(2.36)
This permits the spatial velocity v to be expressed as a function of the spatial distance travelled thus
v = c ì
í
î
1 - æ
è
1 - a0 r

c2
ö
ø
2

 
ü
ý
þ
1/2

 
(2.37)
and it can easily be shown that the time differential of (2.37) equates to (2.34). Converting (2.37) to a simple differential equation in r gives
cdt =


dr

ì
í
î
1 - æ
è
1 - a0 r

c2
ö
ø
2

 
ü
ý
þ
1/2

 
(2.38)
This is a standard integral easily solved by putting
1 - a0 r

c2
= cosf    so that     dr = c2

a0
sinf df
(2.39)
The result is
r = c2

a0
æ
è
1 - cos a0 t

c
ö
ø
(2.40)
Consequently
v = dr

dt
= csin a0 t

c
(2.41)
and therefore finally
a = dv

dt
= a0 cos a0 t

c
(2.42)
From (2.41) v = c when
sin a0 t

c
= 1
(2.43)
i.e. when
t = pc

2a0
(2.44)
and clearly this time may be made as small as required by making a0 as large as necessary. Also insertion of (2.40) and (2.41) into (2.28) confirms that the mass remains constant at m0. Thus it would appear that "light" velocity has been achieved in a finite time whilst maintaining the mass constant at m0, the rest mass. However, unfortunately, all is not as simple as it seems, as was indicated by (2.29). The problem is revealed by determining the energy levels involved. From [1], Eq.(3.19) the kinetic energy associated with spatial motion at relativistic velocities is
Ek = mc2 - m0 c2
(2.45)
expanding this to
Ek = mc2 ì
í
î
1- æ
è
1- v2

c2
ö
ø
1/2

 
ü
ý
þ
(2.46)
enables it to be sensibly applied to the current process. Inserting (2.41) for v and m0 for m gives
Ek = m0 c2 æ
è
1 - cos a0 t

c
ö
ø
(2.47)
so that the matter energy is then
Em = m0 c2cos a0 t

c
(2.48)
and therefore when t reaches the value in (2.44)
Ek = m0 c2

(2.49)
and
Em = 0
What appears to have happened is that the matter energy of the rest mass has all been converted to kinetic energy. The precise manner in which this kinetic energy exists in D0 is unclear, but may be addressed in a future paper. Accordingly, if the above process were proposed for the drive of a futuristic interstellar vehicle, it would be necessary to apply the temporal force in (2.23) only to that part of the vehicle mass identified as "matter fuel". This would mean that the final velocity attained would be less that that of light and therefore to maximise this velocity and thereby minimise the relativistic mass increase of the non- matter fuel component of the vehicle, its infra-structure would have to be as small and as light as possible compared to the mass of the "matter fuel". Also in this application, the ratio of the spatial and temporal components of the impressed force, from (2.23) shows that while the spatial part of (2.23) was larger than the temporal part, the energy extracted from the matter fuel would be insufficient to supply all of the spatial drive. Consequently some form of additional power would be needed during this period. However, once the ratio had reversed and more energy was being extracted than was needed to supply the spatial drive, the subsidiary fuel could thereby be replenished.


R3 Version 1.0.0
Ó P.G.Bass, December 2004

On to the next Section - Conclusions

Back to the introduction to this Paper - Relativistic Fringe Subjects

Back to the Home page for this Site - Home