3   Quantisation of Permitted Orbits.

3.1  Preamble.

The orbital energy quantisations to be derived here will cover the following four cases.
(i)      A simple circular orbit.
(ii)      A simple elliptic orbit.
(iii)     A relativistically mass corrected circular orbit
(iv)     A relativistically mass corrected elliptic orbit.

All of these have been derived before and are therefore well documented in the literature, [3], [4] et al. However, they have been included here for a number of reasons as follows. First, they provide confirmation that the quantisation process presented in this paper, i.e. (2.10), is valid. Secondly, some of the derivation so produced is needed later in this and subsequent papers. Finally, it provides the means by which the values for the quantum numbers used here can be discussed, which realises several factors concerning orbit characteristics which may be new.

It should be noted that in the following derivations the mass referred to as electron mass is the effective mass of the electron as given in [3], i.e.


m# = me mN

me +mN
(3.1)
where
me      is the mass of the electron.
mN      is the mass of the nucleus.
m#      is defined as rest mass, (# = 0), or energy mass, (# absent)

This substitution accounts for the finite mass of the nucleus as it and the electron orbit around a common orbital focal point.

3.2  A Simple Circular Orbit.

In this case (2.10) becomes simply, (by letting c ® ¥)
nh = m0 ó
(ç)
õ

wrdl
(3.2)
and with
dl = rdf
(3.3)
(3.2) becomes
nh = m0 ó
õ
2p

0 
wr 2df
     =2pMf
(3.4)
so that
Mf = nh

2p
(3.5)
Thus from (2.24) the orbital energy, (e = 0, and omitting the relativistic term)

Eor = - 2p 2Z 2e 4m0

n 2h 2
(3.6)
which finally becomes
Eor = - hRhy Z 2

n 2
(3.7)
where
Rhy = 2p 2e 4m0

h 3
(3.8)

is Rydberg's constant (for hydrogen). Eq. (3.6) is well known as the Balmer energy term. Note that in this case



Mf = nh

2p
= nf h

2p
(3.9)
so that, in this case only
nf = n
(3.10)

3.3  A Simple Elliptic Orbit.

In this case (2.10) reduces to
nh =m0 ó
(ç)
õ

æ
è
×
r
 
2
 
+ w 2r 2 ö
ø
1/2
 
dl
(3.11)
and with
dl = æ
è
×
r
 
2
 
+w 2r 2 ö
ø
1/2
 
dt
(3.12)
Eq.(3.11) becomes
nh =m0 ó
(ç)
õ

æ
è
×
r
 
2
 
+w 2r 2 ö
ø
dt
(3.13)
Using (2.19) this reduces to
nh =Mf ó
õ
2p

0 
ì
í
î
1

r 2
æ
è
dr

df
ö
ø
2

 
+1 ü
ý
þ
df
(3.14)
Introducing (2.3) yields
nh =Mf ó
õ
2p

0 
ì
í
î
e 2sin 2f

( 1+ecosf ) 2
+1 ü
ý
þ
df
(3.15)
Integrating the first term in (3.15) by parts gives
nh =Mf ó
õ
2p

0 
ì
í
î
1- ecosf

( 1+ecosf )
ü
ý
þ
df
(3.16)

Now multiplying (3.16) by 2 and (3.15) by -1 and adding gives



nh =-Mf é
ë
ó
õ
2p

0 
ì
í
î
e 2sin 2f

( 1+ecosf ) 2
+1 ü
ý
þ
df -2 ó
õ
2p

0 
ì
í
î
1- ecosf

( 1+ecosf )
ü
ý
þ
df ù
û
(3.17)
which reduces to
nh =Mf ó
õ
2p

0 
1-e 2

( 1+ecosf ) 2
df
(3.18)
From the first part of (2.3) this can be written
nh =Mf ( 1-e 2 )

L 2
ó
õ
2p

0 
r 2df
(3.19)
This integral is well known as twice the area of an elliptic orbit so that it reduces to

nh =2pMf ( 1-e 2 )

L 2
pq
(3.20)

where p and q are the semi-major and semi-minor axes of the elliptic orbit. By virtue of the standard equations for an ellipse, (3.20) finally becomes



nh

2p
= Mf

( 1-e 2 )1/2
(3.21)
So that from (2.24) the orbital energy is, (omitting the relativistic term)
Eor = - hRhy Z 2

n 2
(3.22)
identical to the circular case.

Note that the process here, from (3.14) onwards is essentially the same as presented in [3].

It should be noted that in the above derivation both the azimuthal, nf and the radial, nr quantum numbers have been suppressed because the orbital energy is completely specified by the primary quantum number n. However, both nf and nr are of extreme importance because they dictate the shape of the orbit.

The azimuthal quantum number nf is from (3.9) given by


nf = 2pMf

h
(3.23)
So that from (3.21) and (3.23)
( 1-e 2 )1/2 = nf

n
(3.24)
and with, by definition
n = nf +nr
(3.25)
the radial quantum number is determined.

The primary question is whether nf is an integer for this orbit. In the quantisation of the circular orbit just covered, nf and n are identical so nf is at all times an integer. In the case analysed here the only change to the orbit is that a radial component has been added. Consequently there is no change to the azimuthal component and with Mf still being constant by the law of conservation, it is therefore determined that nf must still be integer. Note that this was effectively invoked in the use of (3.9) to obtain (3.23). Note also from (3.25) that with n and nf being integer, so must nr be. As a result it is possible to determine exactly the characteristics of permitted simple orbits. The term schemes for the first four orbital shells are thus shown in the following table.


nnf nr eCurrent
Term
1100s
2110.87s
200p
3120.94s
210.75p
300d
4130.97s
220.87p
310.66d
400f

Table 3.1 - Basic Orbit Characteristics for the First Four Shells.

From this table a number of orbit features are apparent. First, in the first shell, (n = 1), only one orbit is permitted and this is clearly circular. This must be so in the atoms of all the elements. In the second shell, two orbits are allowed, one elliptical and one circular and this sequence of permitted orbits continues up through the orbit shells with an extra elliptical orbit being added per shell. The orbits correspond to the term letters shown in Section 2.1. Note that in each higher shell the eccentricity of the first orbit is higher than in the previous shell. Thus as n ® ¥, e ® 1 the orbit becomes parabolic and the atom is ionised. However, in a future paper, as additional relativistic correction terms are introduced it will be shown that ionisation takes place long before n ®  ¥. Also, it can clearly be seen from the Table that if nf = 0 then nr = n, (e = 1), and the so called pendulum orbits would result. However, these orbits were proved to be excluded in Section 2. Finally, it can also be seen from the Table that although all the orbitals have, via (3.7) and (3.22), exactly the same orbital energy, the shell/orbital configuration is exactly that which will result in the spectral fine structure when relativistic mass correction is introduced. This is shown in the next two Sections.



P2 Version 2.0.1
Ó P.G.Bass, April 2008

On to the Next Section - Quantisation of Relativistically Mass Corrected Orbits

Back to the Introduction to this Paper - Basic Orbits

Back to the Home Page for this Site - Home