|
To start this derivation, consider the rate of expansion of the Universe in Phase II of its evolution, exemplified by the recession velocity of a random galaxy, a distance of si from the centre, as given by [2], Eq.(3.22)
where H0 is the value of Hubble's "constant" at si, and in which ui had been approximated by unity. In (A.2) the latter approximation can be avoided by using the current empirical value for H0, which automatically includes the correct effect for ui. However, this value applies only at the cosmologically applicable time of tC as fully explained in [2], Section 3.5.
Now if (A.2) is to apply to the boundary of the Universe then it becomes
and in using the above value of H0 in (A.3), the spatial gradient effect between si and su, both at tC, has been ignored. This is effectively once again assuming ui=1 over this distance. Thus (A.3) includes the same degree of approximation as was used in [2] to determine the theoretical value of H0. Therefore, treating H0 in (A3) as a constant, (A.3) can be integrated to give
In (A.4) the cosmologically applicable time tC is the time the
Universe has been expanding from the point of inflexion, and the constant of
integration is therefore the Naperian logarithm of the radius of the point
of inflexion from the centre. In a next paper it will be shown that this
radius is equal to twice the gravitational radius. Thus in (A.4) when tC
= 0
Eq.(A.6) is a simplified relationship between the radius of the Universe and the time at tC in Phase II of its evolution from the point of inflexion. To eliminate au in (A.6) substitute
At the time tC in (A.8), H0 is known to be 22.6 Km/sec/106 L.Y. for which the corresponding value of ru from [2] Eq.(3.24) is 2.1E-29 gm/cm3 and all other terms are constants. Thus if tC were known, a value of su at tC could be calculated. An estimate of tC is constructed as follows. In surveying the recession velocities of the distant galaxies and the density of the Universe, if the range of observations was between say 4 and 8 billion L.Y., and assuming a uniform distribution of observations between that range, then the value of tC would be at the median point of the range and can accordingly be estimated to be approximately 6 billion years ago. In [2] it was stated that the evolution of the Universe was probably some 15 billion years into Phase II from the point of inflexion. The cosmologically applicable time in (A.8), tC, is then estimated as the difference between the above two numbers, i.e. 9 billion years.
Inserting this value, and those for H0 and ru above, together
with the known values for c and g as previously stated, into (A.8) then
yields
as the radius of the Universe at tC. The mass of the Universe can now be calculated using the standard formula to be
Finally, as a matter of interest, au the gravitational radius
of the Universe can now be established as
It should be noted that all the numbers generated here, are very approximate estimates resulting from approximations in the expressions used and the uncertainties in such parameters as ru, H0 and tC. However, these numbers are so large that errors of even one or two magnitudes are insignificant when used in Table 2 and Fig.1 for the purpose intended.
C2 Version 1.2.1
Ó
P.G.Bass, December 2009
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On to the Next Section:- Appendix B
Back to the Introduction to this Paper:- Critical Back to the Home Page for this Site:- Home |