|
Appendix A
Galactic Spectral Redshift in the Relativistic Domain
D1
Coupled with the recession of the distant galaxies is the
Doppler/gravitational shift of their spectral radiation. This is used to
determine the velocity of a receding galaxy. Because the recession
velocities being considered may be a significant fraction of the Terminal
Velocity in this Domain, ( ~ the velocity of light), the derivation of
redshift presented here will include the effects of relativistic velocity
correction. However, by virtue of the definition of the Relativistic
Space-Time Domain D1, the derivation of spectral redshift in this
Domain will differ slightly from that classically presented in the
literature. The derivation of redshift in D1 is presented below,
combining the methods in both [5] and [1], Appendix D.
Let the velocity of a distant spectral emitter, (galaxy), as a function of
the time at its location, with reference to some distant point of
observation within the Universe be uG. If this source galaxy,
within its spectral output generates a particular wave with frequency
f1/ it will be given by
where
n1/ is the number of cycles generated by the source in a time t1/.
t1/ is the local time of the source galaxy.
When this wave is emitted and emerges into the gravitational field of the
source galaxy, (D1), due to the resulting temporal rate change, its
frequency will become
|
f1 = |
dn1/
dt1
|
= |
dn1/
dt1/
|
|
dt1/
dt1
|
= f1/ |
æ è
|
1- |
uG2
c2u12
|
ö ø
|
1/2
|
|
| (A.2) |
Where
u1 is the temporal rate at the location of the source galaxy.
t1 is the local time of free space within D1 at the source galaxy.
These waves, in a unit of time at the source galaxy in D1 occupy a
distance of
So that the apparent wavelength at the point of emission at the source
galaxy is
|
l1 = |
cu1 + uG
|
f1/ |
æ è
|
1 - |
uG2
c2u12
|
ö ø
|
1/2
|
|
|
| (A.4) |
This wavelength incorporates the Doppler shift. The wave then travels to the
distant point of observation, where, if the temporal rate is u2, then
the apparent wavelength will become
|
l1// = |
cu2 + uG ( u2 / u1)
f1//
|
|
| (A.5) |
Now f1// is the frequency of the incident wave from the source galaxy
at the location of the observer and is given by
|
f1// = |
dn1/
dt2
|
= |
dn1/
dt1
|
|
dt1
dt2
|
= f1 |
u1
u2
|
= f1/ |
u1
u2
|
|
æ è
|
1 - |
uG2
c2u12
|
ö ø
|
1/2
|
|
| (A.6) |
So that in (A.5) this gives
|
l1// = |
u2
u1
|
|
|
f1/ |
æ è
|
1 - |
uG2
c2u12
|
ö ø
|
1/2
|
|
|
| (A.7) |
This apparent wavelength now contains a variation due to two causes. The
Doppler shift due to uG, and a gravitational shift
represented by the ratio of the temporal rates at the two locations, u2/u1.
If another wave, of frequency f2, is generated from an identical
source, at the location of the observer, its wavelength will be
Thus from (A.7) and (A.8)
|
|
l1//
l2
|
= |
f2
f1/
|
|
u2
u1
|
|
æ ç ç
ç è
|
|
ö ÷ ÷
÷ ø
|
|
| (A.9) |
Now, the emission of radiation is an internal function of the atom concerned
and independent of the Relativistic Domain in which it occurs. The
consequence of this in (A.9) is that
So that with (A.10), (A.9) becomes
To determine the velocity of recession of the distant emitter galaxy, (A.11)
is now solved for uG to yield
It is important to note that this value is the velocity of recession as
extant at the location of the distant galaxy itself, i.e. measured in terms
of the temporal rate at that location.
If the effects of the gravitational shift can be neglected. i.e. u1 » u2 , (A.12) becomes
However, this approximation is only valid if the emitting galaxy and the
galaxy containing the distant point of observation are of comparable size
and are, on a cosmological scale, relatively close together.
Finally, if uG is very small, it is easily seen that (A.12)
and (A.13) both reduce to non-relativistic equivalents thus
|
uG @ cu1 |
æ è
|
l1// u1
l2 u2
|
-1 |
ö ø
|
|
| (A.14) |
for (A.12), and
|
uG @ cu1 |
æ è
|
l//1
l2
|
-1 |
ö ø
|
|
| (A.15) |
for (A.13), and is clearly a rearrangement of the so called "gross" Doppler
effect.
It is important to note that uG as determined in (A.11) to
(A.13) above, is slower than the classical result due to the presence of the
multiplier temporal rate term u1.
Eq.(A.12) gives the recession velocity of the distant galaxy from the point
of observation. To determine specific values, in addition to knowledge of
l"1 and l2, it is obviously necessary to know
the values of u1 and u2. These can be obtained from [1], Eqs. (4.6) and
(4.7), wherein a reasonable estimate of the masses of the source galaxy and
the galaxy containing the point of observation is required. The value of
s in [1], Eq.(4.7) will be the estimated effective radius of the
source galaxy, and, for the point of observation, the distance of that point
from the centre of the galaxy in which it resides. Clearly the accuracy with
which uG is determined, will depend entirely upon the accuracy
with which these gravitational parameters can be estimated.
In addition to the above, allowance should be made for the temporal rate of
the position of each location relative to the centre of the Universe. This
allowance would normally be incorporated into the temporal rates at the
source galaxy and point of observation. However, this data is currently
unknown and so any computed uG will contain a degree of error.
It is however, considered that this error will be fairly small because of
the extreme size, and age of the Universe as estimated in the main text,
( ~ 45 x 109 years). The error should only approach significant
levels for the most distant galaxies that lie on the radius vector from the
centre of the Universe through the point of observation.
One further point concerning the velocity of light. In general, in the
Relativistic Domain representing the entire Universe, it is given by the
term cu, thereby containing the temporal rate. The temporal rate is given by
() in phase I and () in phase II. In both of these equations the
parameter su appears in the denominator. Because this term, the
radius of the physical Universe, varies with time, so then will the velocity
of light vary according to the contraction of su in phase I and
its expansion in phase II. This is in addition to the variation that occurs
due to gravitation. The temporal variation is again, due to the magnitude of
the parameters involved, a very slow one.
C1 Version 2.1.1
Ó
P.G.Bass March 2005
|